Saturday, October 29, 2016

Saranac 1888 Root Beer (#55 rated - 10.1 out of 12)

This beverage is produced by Matt Brewing Company, which has German origins. It was introduced to the United States in 1880. I previously worked for Charles Bier Bauer Brewing before reorganizing it into The West End Brewery. Like many other companies, soft drink manufacturers used soft drinks to sustain factory operations during Prohibition.


The provided information states, “Since 1888, we have honored our great-grandfather’s commitment to tradition and quality.” However, it is essential to note that the beverage is made with High-Fructose Corn Syrup, which may not align with traditional brewing methods. This practice is intended to maintain a balance between tradition and quality.


The brewery, which is New York State’s oldest and is located in Utica, claims to have a long-standing tradition of taking pride in its creations.



Ingredients: 

Filtered Water, High Fructose Corn Syrup, Caramel Color, Sodium Benzoate (Preserves Freshness), Natural and Artificial Flavors, Aspartame, Citric Acid, Gum Arabic, and Modified Food Starch.

Nutrition 12 oz. serving (from the bottle)

180 Calories
55 mg Sodium.
46 g (15%) of Daily Carbohydrates
0 mg Caffeine

Aroma and Flavor – 2.1 out of 3 mugs

Upon opening, a subtle hint of root beer aroma was present, but the licorice flavor was more pronounced. The initial sip was enjoyable, although it did not stand out as exceptional. I was unable to detect any vanilla notes, and the carbonation resembled that of a highly commercial beer rather than a craft brew. Notably, the beverage contained an unnecessarily high level of sodium. Overall, this drink was deemed satisfactory but penalized 0.5 points for using HFCS.


Head –3 out of 3 mugs

This is an exceptional head! One of the most remarkable qualities is its ability to maintain a high level of foam without dissipating rapidly. After a few minutes, it had not completely dissipated. 


Zip – 2.5 out of 3 mugs

The carbonation and flavor of this beverage provided a refreshing, invigorating experience. It exhibited a high level of carbonation, enhancing its overall appeal.


Post Consumption Impression – 2.5 out of 3 mugs

In summary, the beverage was quite enjoyable. However, the presence of HFCS and sodium content diminishes its desirability, despite its satisfying qualities.


Would I recommend this at 10.1 out of 12 mugs?

Do you like Henry Weinhards? You would like this beverage. The score and enjoyment factor were the same. Add this to the list if you prefer to commercialize Barq’s, A&W, or Dad’s.

OTHER RATINGS

Derek Janiak – 5.1 out of 10 

Monday, October 24, 2016

Mom’s Root Beer (#54 tested - rated 5.25 out of 10)

The beverage is marketed with a charming bottle label that refers to the root beer as “The Better Half.” I attempted to gather information about the brew, but the bottle directs users to www.momsrootbeer.com, which unfortunately results in a “404 (page not found) Error.” Additionally, the bottle mentions that the beverage is distributed by Core Beverage, located in Minneapolis, MN. However, Core Beverage has no website or other available information. Consequently, I lack substantial background knowledge about this beverage, which is unfortunate, as I am interested in understanding its origins and evolution. 



Ingredients: 

Purified carbonated water, pure cane sugar, caramel color, sodium benzoate, natural and artificial flavor, citric acid

Nutrition 12 oz. serving (from the bottle)

160 Calories
45 mg Sodium.
43 g (14%) of Daily Carbohydrates
0 mg Caffeine

Aroma and Flavor – 1.5 out of 3 mugs

The aroma is medicinal, reminiscent of a combination of mint and subtle vanilla. The initial drink was noticeably diluted, although the flavor intensified with the subsequent sip. Regrettably, this beverage does not meet my expectations. Both the aroma and flavor are average at best. 


Head –0.5 out of 3 mugs

The head of the beverage was almost non-existent. Some individuals prefer a minimal or absent head to the beverage. I favor a medium head with a larger foam bubble. This could have been improved.


Zip – 1.5 out of 3 mugs

Although the initial sip lacked significant effervescence, it was only a small portion. However, when consuming a larger quantity, the carbonation provides a subtle sensation, while the flavor profile contributes minimally to this aspect.


Post Consumption Impression – 1.75 out of 3 mugs

Despite scoring this beverage higher than it objectively deserves, as it exceeded the 3.5 rating in the initial three categories, I was unable to raise its score further. This is because the post-consumption impression was merely average, at best.

 
Would I recommend this at 5.25 out of 12 mugs?

Although this beverage is not particularly exceptional, and I would not decline an offer to try it, I would not actively seek it out. This is unfortunate, as the play on words in the name is the beverage's most intriguing aspect.


OTHER RATINGS

Saturday, October 22, 2016

Sky Valley Organic Root Beer (#53, rated 3.25 out of 12)

Therefore, they utilize organic ingredients, including Apple Cider Vinegar. However, they also contain 170 mg of sodium, which is a significant amount even for organic products. This practice is commonly employed in the food industry to enhance the flavor of fat-free foods.




Ingredients: 

Carbonated Water, Organic Cane Sugar, Organic Caramel Color, Organic Vanilla Extract, Natural Flavor, Sea Salt, Organic Apple Cider Vinegar, Citric Acid.

Nutrition 12 oz. serving (from the bottle)

110 Calories
170 mg Sodium.
26 g (9%) of Daily Carbohydrates
0 mg Caffeine

Aroma and Flavor – 1.0 out of 3 mugs

The initial aroma was questionable, lacking the characteristic root beer scent. Instead, it revealed hints of vanilla and a subtle licorice undertone. However, there was an unsettling element present.


Upon the first sip, I recognized that this would be a challenging review to compose, as I endeavor to identify the factors that render root beer enjoyable. This beverage resembled tonic water, infused with a blend of fruit and vinegar. Notably, its sodium content is twice that of any other beverage I have encountered, reaching 170 mg. Is salt necessary to mitigate the vinegar’s sourness?


Head –1.0 out of 3 mugs

The head was composed of fine bubbles lacking the distinct frothiness characteristic of root beer. This was somewhat disappointing.


Zip – 0.5 out of 3 mugs

Although I would like to assign a higher rating, the only distinctive feature I can discern is the combination of vinegar and sodium. This beverage lacks distinctive characteristics and is difficult to classify as root beer. In fact, when I drink mineral water infused with stevia drops, it is a more enjoyable experience overall.


Post Consumption Impression – 0.75 out of 3 mugs

As I consumed more of the beverage, my preference diminished. While it contains a subtle hint of vanilla, which I find agreeable, it lacks any resemblance to root beer.

 
Would I recommend this at 3.25 out of 12 mugs? 

I would shy away from this if you are looking for a root beer.

OTHER RATINGS

Wednesday, October 19, 2016

Stobborn Root Beer (#52 tested rated 4.5 out of 12)

This craft beverage, produced by PepsiCo, initially raised concerns about its commercialization. Introduced in late 2015, it has garnered limited reviews.


To promote its slogan, “IT’S GOOD TO BE STUBBORN™,” the brand has collaborated with Robert Kirkman, the creator and executive producer of “The Walking Dead,” “Outcast,” and Skybound Entertainment, to launch a new campaign.


STUBBORN root beer is crafted using Fair Trade Certified Cane Sugar and Stevia, resulting in a lower-calorie beverage with 100 calories. It incorporates natural flavors and omits High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS), artificial sweeteners, and Azo Dyes.



Ingredients: Carbonated Water, Sugar, Caramel Color, Natural Flavor, Sodium Benzoate (Preserves Freshness), Phosphoric Acid, Purified Stevia Leaf Extract, Citric Acid, Calcium Disodium Edta (To Protect Flavor)

Nutrition 12 oz serving (from the bottle)

100 Calories
85 mg Sodium.
27 g (9%) of Daily Carbohydrates
0 mg Caffeine

Aroma and Flavor – 1.5 out of 3 mugs

Upon my initial assessment, I was astounded to discover that the beverage contains an astonishing 85 mg of sodium. This revelation is not unexpected, considering its origin from PepsiCo. The company’s strategy of enhancing cravings to increase consumption is evident in this formulation.


The opening experience was delightful. The beverage emitted a distinct, pronounced rooty aroma, providing a clear indication of its characteristics. Upon the first sip, I comprehended the rationale behind this sensory perception. Birch beer is renowned for its more pronounced aroma compared to root beer. This beverage more closely resembles birch beer than root beer. Typically, birch beer is crafted from oil distilled from birch sap, resulting in a dry, distinctive flavor profile.


The initial sip further solidified my perception of mild carbonation, dryness, and a low-sweetener taste. The beverage left my mouth feeling quite dry, possibly due to its higher sodium content or other ingredients. As I continued to consume the beverage, the dryness in my mouth intensified. While this aspect may not have received the highest rating, it is a blend that strikes a balance between its characteristics.


Head – 0.5 out of 3 mugs

Upon further inspection, I discovered foam. However, upon attempting to confirm its existence, it mysteriously vanished.        

Zip – 1.25 out of 3 mugs

This beverage was relatively dry and uneventful. I could detect the stevia flavor, which I am familiar with as I occasionally use stevia in mineral water. If the carbonation were lower, this beverage would be closer to that taste. This beverage has lower carbonation.


Post Consumption Impression – 1.25 out of 3 mugs

If you prefer a dry, low-calorie beverage with stevia, this is worth trying. However, I must admit that it does not align with my personal taste preferences. While I would not refuse a complimentary bottle, I would not consider spending money on this particular brew.

 
Would I recommend this at 4.5 out of 12 mugs?

It may not be the best option. If you prefer a dry beverage similar to birch beer, try it.


Other Reviews

Saturday, October 15, 2016

Blummers (#51 - Rated 7.5 out of 12)

The bottle bears the inscription “Est. 1845,” indicating it has existed for nearly 171 years. While the bottler possesses a rich history, the root beer itself does not share this heritage.


It is known that the Monroe Brewing Company was established by Mr. Bissinger in 1845. He managed it for three years before John Knipschlidt assumed control for nine years. The brewery's ownership changed frequently until Adam Blumer Sr. took over in 1892. In 1906, the name was changed to Blumer Brewing Company. In 1938, production was significantly reduced, and the brewery primarily served as a cheese storage facility. Notably, this occurred in Wisconsin.


In 1947, the business was sold to Joseph Huber, who renamed it Joseph Huber Brewing Company. He leased the facility until 1967 when he acquired the site. In 1985, Bill Smith and Craig Werle took over the brewery and reached its peak capacity. During this period, they introduced Mike’s Hard Lemonade, which was subsequently sold to Stroh Brewing Company, which later merged with Pabst Brewing Company.


Fred Huber acquired the brewery in 1989. Subsequent changes occurred, culminating in the Minhas family purchasing the brewery on October 3, 2006, and renaming it.


Interestingly, despite the extensive history I have uncovered, I have yet to ascertain the precise origin of root beer. The company proudly claims it is “Certified Kosher.”  



Ingredients: 

Carbonated water, sugar, natural and artificial flavors, caramel color, phosphoric acid, sodium benzoate, and potassium sorbate (to preserve freshness)

Nutrition 12 oz serving (from the bottle)

177 Calories
13.7 mg Sodium.
43.1g (13%) of Daily Carbohydrates
0 mg Caffeine

Aroma and Flavor – 1.75 out of 3 mugs

The aroma is rather subtle. There was nothing particularly pleasant or unpleasant, but the wintergreen flavor was discernible. I am not an avid wintergreen enthusiast, as evidenced by my initial experience with the beverage. Additionally, there is a pleasant vanilla and creamy undertone. I even detect a faint hint of butterscotch. This flavor profile is not overpowering, but it lacks any extraordinary impact.


Head – 2.0 out of 3 mugs

The head is of medium height but short-lived. Upon pouring the beverage, I immediately considered it a potential candidate for a delightful root beer float.       

Zip – 1.75 out of 3 mugs

The flavor combination is excessive for my palate. While it presents an intriguing blend of flavors, including wintergreen, vanilla, and butterscotch, it also evokes a distinct sensation reminiscent of Juicy Fruit gum. Notably, the carbonation level is relatively low.


Post Consumption Impression – 2.0 out of 3 mugs

This experience was peculiar. I would consume a beverage and thoroughly enjoy it, only to take another and believe I have finished. This cycle persisted. Overall, I found more enjoyment than dislike. This demonstrates that I have evaluated 51 root beers to date, and this ranks 26th.

 
Would I recommend this at 7.5 out of 12 mugs?

My girlfriend found this enjoyable while I remained indifferent. I encourage you to try it. It is difficult to believe that you would not find it at least average.


OTHER RATINGS

Sunday, October 9, 2016

Vermont Sweetwater Rugged Mountain Root Beer (#50 - Rated 5.25 out of 12)

Vermont Sweetwater Company, a small family-owned and operated beverage company, produces all-natural beverages. Their website states, “made with the finest ingredients.” This is a direct quote from their website. Unlike many other beverage companies, Vermont Sweetwater Company uses unique ingredients. It may be a characteristic of Vermont-based companies. 



Ingredients: 

Carbonated water, evaporated cane juice, natural flavors, spices, and citric acid

Nutrition 12 oz serving (from the bottle)

180 Calories
7.5 mg Sodium.
42g (13%) of Daily Carbohydrates
0 mg Caffeine

Aroma and Flavor – 1.25 out of 3 mugs

Upon initial inspection, the beverage appears to be root beer, but its sweetness is attributed to evaporated cane juice, a less common ingredient in traditional root beer.


The aroma upon opening is reminiscent of Sprite, suggesting a possible connection to that beverage. However, the taste profile deviates significantly from what one would expect from root beer. It is excessively sweet, with subtle hints of sassafras and wintergreen, akin to a low-carbonated Sprite infused with these flavors.


Given these characteristics, it is unlikely that this beverage is a traditional root beer. It could be a wintergreen-flavored ginger ale or cream soda, but further analysis is required to determine its exact composition.


Head –1.0 out of 3 mugs

The head was diminutive and swiftly dissipated, leaving no discernible trace.          

Zip – 1.5 out of 3 mugs

The beverage has the highest rating across all three categories. Upon consumption, I do not perceive carbonation or a strong punch, but rather a perplexing sensation. I am unable to identify its characteristics or place it in any specific category, which makes it intriguing.


Post Consumption Impression – 1.5 out of 3 mugs

Although this beverage has received a low rating, it is not the worst option available. In fact, if it were to resemble root beer, it could be considered average, and I would be inclined to try it again. However, I would only consider it if I am seeking a beverage with a flavor profile that deviates from root beer.

 
Would I recommend this at 5.25 out of 12 mugs?

The rating is low and may be overly critical. While I personally enjoy root beer, this beverage is not a direct substitute. However, it could still be an enjoyable choice for specific occasions. It is of sufficient quality that I would consider purchasing it again. Nevertheless, if I am craving a traditional root beer, I would opt for something else.


OTHER RATINGS